Reply To: Free util to convert .cwp (CbB and earlier) to .song (Studio One)

[Peter DeLegge]

fretman wrote:

CdB’s MIDI/VSTi implementation seemed very awkward to me. I never got the feel of how that worked. Studio One’s approach seems much more intuitive to me. Plus, it’s plethora of training materials let’s me find what I want pretty easily. The work flow just seems to fit my style (mostly acoustic driven instrumentals – all VSTi). https://www.taxi.com/members/fretman

I admit, I was looking at Cakewalk Forum last night and Wookiee — FTR, a really sweet and kind person, who poured out some heartbreaking things in our PMS,  I have nothing but fondness for him and would love to see him here  — posted that Studio One Pro perpetual license was kind of a joke and that you need to buy a subscription for it to be worthwhile. I was kind of blown away that he wrote that, because it seemed in the realm of competitor bashing and stretching truth in order to pump up his BandLab.

As I contemplated buying a perpetual license update for Studio One Pro this week, I’d be interested what actual users of Studio One Pro users have to say with regard to Wookiees point. Is it BS? Is he just trashing a competitor and being dishonest about Studio One Pro in order to hype on BandLab as it appears he is doing (it’s not subtle), or is their any merit to his trashing of a BandLab competitor’s product?

LinkedMusicians Founder. Your friend who keeps the beat.

Check out my music.